Really? It is now up to 100 papers. Can you tell the readers which one of the 100 papers have been debunked? More than one of the 100 papers? Please specify all the papers that have been debunked.
This idea came forward 3 years ago and got a large, broad exercise across the media. Climate change is spilt on party lines, not scientific. I see this as being just another ploy by the deniers to scrap the incentives.
smitthhyyJanuary 28, 2019 / 11:58 pm
@JohnClark, that’s not providing any evidence of your statement that it’s long been debunked. It would be really good if you could because I can’t find any. That is if you can. If you can’t that’s fine too, just say so people reading the article and comments have factual information, not just an off the cuff comment.
this has long since been debunked!
Really? It is now up to 100 papers. Can you tell the readers which one of the 100 papers have been debunked? More than one of the 100 papers? Please specify all the papers that have been debunked.
This idea came forward 3 years ago and got a large, broad exercise across the media. Climate change is spilt on party lines, not scientific. I see this as being just another ploy by the deniers to scrap the incentives.
@JohnClark, that’s not providing any evidence of your statement that it’s long been debunked. It would be really good if you could because I can’t find any. That is if you can. If you can’t that’s fine too, just say so people reading the article and comments have factual information, not just an off the cuff comment.