Russian Scientists say period of global cooling ahead due to changes in the sun

It has aways been the sun!  I am more inclined to believe Russian scientist who do not have to depend on AGW grants to feed their children, rather than the usual team of rent seeking climate scientist that make up the AGW Cult.

Watts Up With That?

From Radio Voice of Russia:

Russia’s Pulkovo Observatory: “we could be in for a cooling period that lasts 200-250 years”

Scientists at Russia’s famous Pulkovo Observatory are convinced that the world is in for a period of global cooling.

archibald_1749_2049_projected_solar_cycle

Graph by David Archibald

Global warming which has been the subject of so many discussions in recent years, may give way to global cooling. According to scientists from the Pulkovo Observatory in St.Petersburg, solar activity is waning, so the average yearly temperature will begin to decline as well. Scientists from Britain and the US chime in saying that forecasts for global cooling are far from groundless. Some experts warn that a change in the climate may affect the ambitious projects for the exploration of the Arctic that have been launched by many countries.

View original post 405 more words

Advertisements

Author: Russ Steele

Freelance writer and climate change blogger. Russ spent twenty years in the Air Force as a navigator specializing in electronics warfare and digital systems. After his service he was employed for sixteen years as concept developer for TRW, an aerospace and automotive company, and then was CEO of a non-profit Internet provider for 18 months. Russ's articles have appeared in Comstock's Business, Capitol Journal, Trailer Life, Monitoring Times, and Idaho Magazine.

3 thoughts on “Russian Scientists say period of global cooling ahead due to changes in the sun”

  1. Hi Russ and all,
    Such “scientists” who fit so perfectly in the disaster we call a “government” are not scientists. But – government has almost no place in science. AGW, a government program to twist science, will cause premature human deaths, perhaps far beyond what it appears to have caused already.

  2. I used to think the definition of Science was this:
    “Predictive logic verified by double-blind observational methods.”

    But now modern society has corrected and informed me that Science is this:
    “Hot air emitted by a highly indoctrinated, tenured, bureaucrat with university-blessed letters after his or her name.”

    If ‘Science’ is the latter then why bother with it?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s