The Wrong Solution

Russ Steele

Ignoring the cyclical nature of climate history President Obama is placing the United States on a path that will prepare the county for global warming, when there is a higher probability of global cooling.

As leaders in Washington obsess about the fiscal cliff, President Barack Obama is putting in place the building blocks for a climate treaty requiring the first fossil- fuel emissions cuts from both the U.S. and China.

State Department envoy Todd Stern is in Doha this week working to clear the path for an international agreement by 2015. While Obama failed to deliver on his promise to start a cap-and-trade program in his first term, he’s working on policies that may help cut greenhouse gases 17 percent by 2020 in the U.S., historically the world’s biggest polluter.

“We are making good progress, and I think we are on track,” Stern told reporters today in Doha when asked if the U.S. can meet its goal even if Congress doesn’t pass climate legislation this decade.

Obama has moved forward with greenhouse-gas rules for vehicles and new power plants, appliance standards and investment in low-emitting energy sources. He’s also doubled use of renewable power and has called for 80 percent of U.S. electricity to come from “clean” energy sources, including nuclear and natural gas, by 2035.

“The president is laying the foundations for real action on climate change,” Jake Schmidt, who follows international climate policy for the Washington-based Natural Resources Defense Council, said in an interview in Doha. “Whether or not he decides to jump feet first into the international arena, we’ll see.”

You can read more HERE. The article concludes:

“The interesting thing is that for the past three UN climate conferences, the U.S. delegation has never talked about this,” Stavins said in an interview. “They haven’t been interested in taking credit internationally for what’s already in place. When I mention this to other parts of the world, people are shocked.”

The silence, he said, is understandable in part because the “last thing” the Obama administration wants is for State Department officials overseas making it appear as if the White House was trying to “take an end run around the Congress” on climate policy.

“It would have been very bad for the president’s re- election,” he said.

The election is over and the stupidity can commence. Let the end run around scientific reason begin.  Large segments of the economy will be preparing for warming, burning our food for fuel, installing solar panels that only work when the sun is shining and wind turbines that turn when the power is not needed and require back ups generators, all the  while the earth cooling.   Can anyone think of a worse case scenario? Millions will die from starvation as we burn the food need for survival. Millions will freeze when there is not enough affordable energy to stay warm.

3 thoughts on “The Wrong Solution

  1. Ben Emery December 5, 2012 / 8:53 pm

    I figure you would like the ineffectiveness of the UN and international cooperation on global warming. The main problem with the United Nations is the power a small few nations having the power of a veto. Unfortunately, in my opinion, most of these member states put profit before people.

  2. David December 6, 2012 / 3:15 am

    I think the death toll will be in the billions if we had anything similar to the LIA. We like to think how superior we are to the savages of just 200 years ago. However coming from a family of farmers if the fields are wet you can’t plow. As we learned this year if you have a drought the crops dont grow. At least the savages kept a lot of food in storage we have very little reserves for 7 billion people. I like to relate where we are to the Titanic we have no where near enough lifeboats and we are lined up with the iceberg.
    We may have found a cure for obesity in this Grand Minimum. I hope like hell I am wrong but I will not bet my life on it. I have a year supply of food on hand and my finger on the trigger to buy another. If I am wrong I will have some cheap food to eat in 20 years. If I am right I have somwthing to eat when the stores are empty.

    • Russ December 8, 2012 / 2:08 pm


      See my review of Dr Peters latest book, she recommends preparation as the best solution.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s